Mason Wyler And The Question Of HIV Status Among Pornstars

Mason Wyler And The Question Of HIV Status Among PornstarsThanks to one angry roommate and one pseudo-moralistic blogger, last week it was revealed that Mason Wyler is HIV+. Wyler says he’s only shooting solo scenes from now on, but should HIV positive pornstars be allowed to play with others?

There is some complicated drama going on in gay porn land. In May of this year, Mason Wyler tested positive for HIV. Because of this, as stipulated by his contract with Next Door Studios, he transitioned from doing scenes with partners to solo and webcam performances (a fact which caused no small amount of confusion). By June, both Sword editor Zach Sire and GayPornGossip editor Mark Wilson had learned of this fact but decided not to report it because, you know, doing so would have made them assholes.

Mason Wyler And The Question Of HIV Status Among PornstarsLast week Wyler’s disgruntled roommate and fellow pornstar Porter Wescott took to his blog and twitter account to tell the world that Wyler had contracted Hepatitis C. This itself was a fib that Wyler had made up to explain the changes in his work with Next Door Studios. News of this shocking “revelation” drove GayPornGossip’s Mark Wilson to out Wyler and his abhorrant HIV/Hep C combo platter. As Wilson said:

…Over the past several months we have closely watched the behavior of Mason and we find that he isn’t doing what should rightly be done -one of many examples of very alarming nature is Mason’s current Adam4Adam profile which clearly states that he is HIV negative.

Mason Wyler And The Question Of HIV Status Among PornstarsThe Sword instantly responded with an attack on Wilson that (rightly) criticized him for his pompous, hard-line moralizing. Of course, in doing so The Sword’s Zach Sire also managed to help transform the rumor-mongering of a single website into a juicy “blogger war” that has brought far more attention to Wyler’s HIV status than might have been given otherwise.

Still, the real issue here is not how the story got out, but how and why this news will affect Wyler’s career. Wyler’s contract with Next Door Studios may have prohibited seropositive performers from working with other actors, but Raging Stallion’s Chris Ward has already released a message of support as well as a possible job offer:

Raging Stallion practices safe sex on all of its video shoots—indeed we enjoy filming hot safe sex and showing other gay men how to have hot safe sex. HIV status should not be an issue when shooting porn if the actors are using condoms and using common sense. Raging Stallion would love to shoot Mason Wyler in an upcoming movie. He is a great actor and I have always wanted to work with him. Nothing has changed from my perspective.

Mason Wyler And The Question Of HIV Status Among PornstarsAnd so the question becomes: should HIV+ pornstars perform with others? Condoms, like everything else, are not 100% effective, and given that a pornstar performs with multiple partners throughout his or her career the chances of one small but disastrous mistake happening increase with each passing scene. On the other hand, prohibiting Wyler from continuing to pursue his career and having sex with other porn stars (assuming he even wants to do so) amounts to a form of discrimination. Condoms, after all, are the best line of defense against STI transmission. Arguing that even the smallest chance of contracting the disease isn’t worth the risk acts as an indictment against mixed-serostatus couplings regardless of circumstance. The fact is that lot’s of HIV- people have protected sex with HIV+ people and come out fine. In fact, HIV- gay men will stay with their HIV+ partners for years without contracting the disease. Maybe seeing a porn star confidently getting reamed by Mason Wyler would send a positive message to the gay community—that our HIV+ brothers are not lepers who should be banished to some bareback colony where they can stay away from those of us who remain uninfected.

It’s a particularly complex issue. We’re lucky enough to live in an age where, amongst members of a certain class possessing access to certain medications, HIV is a relatively manageable disease. One would hope that the stigma attached to those who carried the virus in years past might have evaporated as we’ve learned more about it, but this saga reminds us that not everyone has gotten over their hang-ups about HIV.

· Mason Wyler: “I’m HIV Positive” (thesword.com)
· Is Mason Wyler Spreading Diseases? (gayporngossip.com)

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

Subscribe

Subscribe to our e-mail newsletter to receive updates.

  • Anonymous

    My ex of two years was both a porn star and was HIV+ (18 years at the time). I detest condoms but to make it work we made a game and ritual about putting them on and ya know what – it worked out just fine. That was 6 years ago and I’m still negative.

    So what if he is +? This is 2010 not 1982. It’s unfortunate, and can be downright inconvenient, but being positive is not tragic. He makes the changes he needs to make in how he lives his life so as not to spread the disease and then moves on.

  • mikedreyden

    it would be nice if everyone backed off and let mason deal with what he has to. i mean really!

  • Anonymous

    I don’t follow Mason to much, but I think this says something about not using condoms in porn.

  • gaypornfanatic

    I agree with you! Just because he is HIV positive does not mean he needs to chop off his dick and take a vow of celibacy.

  • chuckrich81

    I’m a strong proponent of let consenting adults do what they want. So as long as his status is known to performers, if they’re willing to do a scene with him more power to them.

  • Anonymous

    I’ve always found it incongruous that anyone in the porn industry would take such sanctimonious or moral stands on HIV, STDs, or even barebacking. Like with Mason Wyler, he (and the studios he’s worked for) has sold himself as a slut. So he’s HIV+. Uh, surprise..? Even if porn films use condoms, they’re still promoting promiscuity– and in some cases really edgy behavior– when there’s really no such thing as 100% safe sex. It just seems like a disconnect from reality. I’m not saying you can’t have safe sex with many sex partners (or even just one) and not catch an STD, but I just can’t see how you can work in the porn industry and not have an enlightened point of view on HIV.

    I guess a short way of saying this is that while I haven’t really followed Wyler that much, I don’t judge how or why he got the virus. As someone who enjoys porn, all I can say is that I hope he gets the support from his friends and the industry to get on with his life.

  • TrueWords

    Aiden Shaw has worked for many years in porn and he is HIV+. His life has been documented in his books.

    Mason is one of MANY porn performers/escorts that are HIV+ and have not disclosed the general public.

    Bareback porn placed a lot of people in a weird spot where the money was a draw and the risk was even hotter.

    The reality is if I test you on Tuesday and you are negative that means NOTHING…I would have to put you in solitary confinement, come back in 3-6 months and test again as the antibodies might be present.

    Too many gay men are completely clueless in regards to their status and it is EASIER to say negative or avoid it ALL together…than have the conversations that need to go on

  • Anonymous

    Ya know, from a desktop it’s really easy to have a simple view of this…but when you are in a situation and someone tells you they are positive, it’s disingenuous to suggest that it doesn’t it matter. Fear, protection, bigorty, whatever you chose to call it…it matters.

    JMHO.

  • jefmlep

    Why won’t people just wear goddamn condoms? seriously! Is it that difficult? People are morons… i know they are not 100% effective, but they are at something like 98% i think? it’s still would slow the spread of the disease.

    If he wears condoms and the partners are aware that he is HIV+ then i think he should be allowed to do scenes with partners.