“Boys @ Work” Endanger Themselves (And Our Eyes, Our Eyes!)

Hello, porn studio people? Haven’t you been paying attention to us? What did we say just a few days ago? Wasn’t it something about backing off the workplace clichés? And yet, what do you keep giving us? That’s right: more workplace clichés! (And not the clever kind our readers have been coming up with either!)

Not to point fingers–but we’re looking at you, Man’s Art, with your just-released “Boys @ Work”. Not only could you not be bothered to type out “at”, but you substituted an asperand for it. In days of yore–say, 1997–that might’ve been a mildly clever title if your film were about hot web designers and the mischief they get up to after hours, when all that Jolt cola finally hits their systems and they take off their clothes and start coding like horned up jackrabbits. But now it just feels lazy.

And can we also say something about that stylist you hired, who looks like he was last employed during the Jeff Stryker era? Those highlights! Those too-artful smudges of faux machine grease! That hair gel that looks like it was troweled on with a sledgehammer! Indeed, these are a few of our least favorite things.

And speaking of sledgehammers: is that a sledgehammer down the front of that guy’s pants on the left? And does blondie really know what he’s doing with that reciprocating saw? Have you properly trained these people? Just because you’re making a porn movie–and, like, European–doesn’t mean you can’t be cited for safety violations. Keep it up and the next knock at the door won’t be a scantily clad pizza boy–it’ll be OSHA. We’re just warning you because we care.

“Boys @ Work” (TLAvideo.com)
Man’s Art (mans-art.com)

Tags: , , , ,

Subscribe

Subscribe to our e-mail newsletter to receive updates.

  • narymary

    Yeah, the guys who work in the shop at my job are about 1000x hotter due to them actually being dirty, scruffy and sexy. These guys look like they’d faint from five minutes worth of manual labor that didn’t involve dick holding.

  • mexiback

    Cheers, fleshbot guy! I didn’t know you could be like, funny! I mean, I come here for the hot guys, I don’t really expect the lulzz, but you just delivered!

  • will

    I am thoroughly fascinated by the fact that @ has its own Wikipedia entry, and such a long one! What peculiar sorts of people are so fascinated by a typographical symbol that they would devote so much time and energy to this Wiki article?

    I’ll have to get back to you on the silly looking box cover, I’m going to look up & now!

  • will

    OK, about the cover: Middle guy with the saw looks VERY angry, so I’d advise the other guys to hightail it outta there.

  • Charles_Barrett – Now with Variable-Valve Timing

    @mexiback: Oh, our STURTLE has a quick wit and a sharp, wry tongue. His prose is indeed top-notch, and every bit worth the visit here…

    @narymary: Agreed. These waifs look like standing up too rapidly would make them faint…